Augment Code vs Cursor
Which Code Assistant is right for you? See our complete breakdown.
| Feature | Augment Code | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| MegaOne Score | 7/10 | 9/10 |
| Category | Code Assistant | Code Assistant |
| Pricing Model | Paid Only | Freemium |
| Starting Price | $20.00/mo | $8.00/mo |
| Free Tier | No | Yes |
| API Available | No | No |
| Open Source | No | No |
| iOS App | No | No |
| Android App | No | No |
| Chrome Extension | No | No |
| Company | Augment Computing Inc. | SpaceXAI |
| Total Funding | $252M | $3.4B |
Visual Comparison
About Augment Code
An AI-powered platform that assists developers and engineering teams with context-aware code understanding, generation, and workflow acceleration.
Augment Code is an AI coding platform designed to enhance developer productivity by providing deep, context-aware understanding of entire codebases. It offers an AI agent for planning and building code, chat functionalities, and code completion, integrating with popular IDEs like VSCode and JetBrains. The platform includes Cosmos, an agentic system for the software development lifecycle, and the Auggie CLI, supporting various programming languages and team workflows.
About Cursor
Cursor is an AI-powered code editor and agentic coding platform designed to boost developer productivity.
Cursor is an AI-powered integrated development environment (IDE) that deeply integrates AI into the coding workflow, functioning as an AI coding agent and software development environment. It helps engineers code with AI by automating coding tasks, streamlining codebase management, and supporting rapid iteration, allowing developers to delegate coding tasks to agents while maintaining control over direction, review, and iteration.
Cursor takes the edge
With a MegaOne score of 9/10 versus 7/10, Cursor edges ahead of Augment Code in our analysis. However, Augment Code may still be the better choice depending on your specific use case and budget.