Cursor vs Pieces
Which Code Assistant is right for you? See our complete breakdown.
| Feature | Cursor | Pieces |
|---|---|---|
| MegaOne Score | 9/10 | 5/10 |
| Category | Code Assistant | Code Assistant |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting Price | $20.00/mo | $18.99/mo |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| API Available | No | No |
| Open Source | No | No |
| iOS App | No | No |
| Android App | No | No |
| Chrome Extension | No | No |
| Company | Anysphere, Inc. | Mesh Intelligent Technologies, Inc. |
| Total Funding | $3.3B | $14M |
Visual Comparison
About Cursor
Cursor is your coding agent for building ambitious software.
Cursor is an AI coding platform and development environment that helps developers write, edit, search, and understand code using natural-language instructions. It features agentic development workflows, allowing developers to delegate coding tasks to AI agents for multi-file edits, code generation, and code review with tools like Bugbot. It supports both local and cloud agents and offers context-aware code completion.
About Pieces
Pieces is an AI-enabled productivity tool and on-device copilot that acts as a long-term memory layer for developers, enhancing efficiency across their workflow.
Pieces runs in the background on your computer, forming a searchable memory that automatically captures and enriches work context, including code, documents, chats, and links. It builds artificial memory from your work to help users recover decisions, resume tasks, and provide real-time context to AI tools, operating privately and offline-first by default.
Cursor takes the edge
With a MegaOne score of 9/10 versus 5/10, Cursor edges ahead of Pieces in our analysis. However, Pieces may still be the better choice depending on your specific use case and budget.