Continue vs Cursor
Which Code Assistant is right for you? See our complete breakdown.
| Feature | Continue | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| MegaOne Score | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Category | Code Assistant | Code Assistant |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting Price | $20.00/mo | $20.00/mo |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| API Available | No | No |
| Open Source | No | No |
| iOS App | No | No |
| Android App | No | No |
| Chrome Extension | No | No |
| Company | Continue, Inc. | Anysphere, Inc. |
| Total Funding | $5M | $4.3B |
Visual Comparison
About Continue
Continue.dev is an open-source AI coding assistant that integrates into IDEs, offering customizable AI models for chat, autocomplete, and automated code checks.
Continue.dev is an open-source AI coding assistant that integrates as an extension into VS Code and JetBrains IDEs. It provides features like autocomplete, chat, edit, and agent mode, allowing developers to use and configure various LLM models (local or hosted) for a highly customizable workflow. The platform has evolved into a 'Continuous AI' system, enabling automated AI agent checks on every pull request for quality control and enhanced developer productivity.
About Cursor
An AI-first code editor built as a fork of VS Code, enabling developers to write, debug, and ship code faster using natural language.
Cursor is an AI coding agent and software development environment that allows users to edit code, search codebases, run commands, and complete programming tasks using natural-language instructions. As an AI-first code editor, forked from VS Code, it offers deep codebase understanding, multi-file editing, and an autonomous agent mode to plan, write, test, and fix code with minimal human input.
Cursor takes the edge
With a MegaOne score of 8/10 versus 6/10, Cursor edges ahead of Continue in our analysis. However, Continue may still be the better choice depending on your specific use case and budget.