Head-to-Head Comparison

Continue vs Cursor

Which Code Assistant is right for you? See our complete breakdown.

Continue

5/10 Visit Continue
VS

Cursor

9/10 Our Pick Visit Cursor
FeatureContinueCursor
MegaOne Score5/109/10
CategoryCode AssistantCode Assistant
Pricing ModelOpen SourceFreemium
Starting PriceFree / Open Source$20.00/mo
Free TierYesYes
API AvailableNoNo
Open SourceNoNo
iOS AppNoNo
Android AppNoNo
Chrome ExtensionNoNo
CompanyContinue Dev, Inc. (acquired by Cursor)Anysphere, Inc.
Total Funding$5M$3.3B

Visual Comparison

Score Reach Value Team Funding Reviews
Continue Cursor

About Continue

An open-source AI coding assistant that integrates with IDEs, allowing developers to use various LLMs for code completion, chat, and agentic workflows.

Continue.dev was an open-source AI coding assistant available as an extension for VS Code and JetBrains IDEs, and a CLI. It enabled developers to connect to various large language models (LLMs) for features like inline code completions, a sidebar chat interface for code explanation and generation, and multi-step agentic workflows. The tool prioritized extensibility, privacy, and model agnosticism, allowing users to define custom rules and integrate with their existing development environments.

About Cursor

Cursor is your coding agent for building ambitious software.

Cursor is an AI coding platform and development environment that helps developers write, edit, search, and understand code using natural-language instructions. It features agentic development workflows, allowing developers to delegate coding tasks to AI agents for multi-file edits, code generation, and code review with tools like Bugbot. It supports both local and cloud agents and offers context-aware code completion.

Cursor takes the edge

With a MegaOne score of 9/10 versus 5/10, Cursor edges ahead of Continue in our analysis. However, Continue may still be the better choice depending on your specific use case and budget.