Cursor vs Tabby
Which Code Assistant is right for you? See our complete breakdown.
| Feature | Cursor | Tabby |
|---|---|---|
| MegaOne Score | 9/10 | 5/10 |
| Category | Code Assistant | Code Assistant |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium, Open Source |
| Starting Price | $20.00/mo | $19.00/mo |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| API Available | No | No |
| Open Source | No | No |
| iOS App | No | No |
| Android App | No | No |
| Chrome Extension | No | No |
| Company | Anysphere, Inc. | TabbyML, Inc. |
| Total Funding | $3.3B | $4M |
Visual Comparison
About Cursor
Cursor is your coding agent for building ambitious software.
Cursor is an AI coding platform and development environment that helps developers write, edit, search, and understand code using natural-language instructions. It features agentic development workflows, allowing developers to delegate coding tasks to AI agents for multi-file edits, code generation, and code review with tools like Bugbot. It supports both local and cloud agents and offers context-aware code completion.
About Tabby
Tabby is an open-source, self-hosted AI coding assistant that provides real-time code suggestions and autocompletion.
Tabby is an open-source, self-hosted AI coding assistant designed to enhance developer productivity by providing real-time code suggestions and autocompletion. It serves as an on-premises alternative to proprietary tools like GitHub Copilot, allowing developers to maintain control over their code and data. Tabby integrates seamlessly with popular Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) such as Visual Studio Code, Vim/Neovim, and JetBrains IDEs, and supports various coding LLMs.
Cursor takes the edge
With a MegaOne score of 9/10 versus 5/10, Cursor edges ahead of Tabby in our analysis. However, Tabby may still be the better choice depending on your specific use case and budget.