Cursor vs Poolside
Which Code Assistant is right for you? See our complete breakdown.
| Feature | Cursor | Poolside |
|---|---|---|
| MegaOne Score | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Category | Code Assistant | Code Assistant |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting Price | $8.00/mo | $0.06/mo |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| API Available | No | No |
| Open Source | No | No |
| iOS App | No | No |
| Android App | No | No |
| Chrome Extension | No | No |
| Company | Anysphere, Inc. (subsidiary of SpaceXAI) | Poolside |
| Total Funding | $3.4B | $1.6B |
Visual Comparison
About Cursor
An AI-native code editor that helps developers write, refactor, and review code faster using advanced language models and agentic workflows.
Cursor is an agentic coding platform built on VS Code, integrating AI directly into the development environment. It enables developers to delegate coding tasks to AI agents, understand entire codebases, and perform multi-file edits, accelerating software development. The platform supports cloud-based agents for scalable tasks and offers features like next-action prediction and context visibility.
About Poolside
Poolside is an AI lab that trains open-weight foundation models specifically for software engineering and agentic coding.
Poolside develops large language models for computer software and coding applications, focusing on agentic coding and long-horizon software tasks. It provides agentic coding models, self-managed inference, APIs, and agent workflows for organizations to run AI within their controlled environments, including on-premises and air-gapped setups. The company's models are designed to create and test code using natural-language prompts from developers, enhancing productivity and code quality.
Cursor takes the edge
With a MegaOne score of 9/10 versus 8/10, Cursor edges ahead of Poolside in our analysis. However, Poolside may still be the better choice depending on your specific use case and budget.