Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
Which Code Assistant is right for you? See our complete breakdown.
| Feature | Cursor | GitHub Copilot |
|---|---|---|
| MegaOne Score | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Category | Code Assistant | Code Assistant |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting Price | $20.00/mo | $10.00/mo |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| API Available | No | No |
| Open Source | No | No |
| iOS App | No | No |
| Android App | No | No |
| Chrome Extension | No | No |
| Company | Anysphere, Inc. | GitHub |
| Total Funding | $3.3B | $350M |
Visual Comparison
About Cursor
Cursor is your coding agent for building ambitious software.
Cursor is an AI coding platform and development environment that helps developers write, edit, search, and understand code using natural-language instructions. It features agentic development workflows, allowing developers to delegate coding tasks to AI agents for multi-file edits, code generation, and code review with tools like Bugbot. It supports both local and cloud agents and offers context-aware code completion.
About GitHub Copilot
GitHub Copilot is an AI-powered coding assistant that provides real-time code suggestions, completions, and agentic capabilities across various IDEs and platforms.
GitHub Copilot is an advanced AI-powered coding assistant that offers real-time code suggestions, completions, and intelligent development support across multiple programming languages and IDEs. It leverages large language models to generate code, answer questions, explain concepts, and automate tasks through an agent mode, integrating seamlessly into developer workflows.
Cursor takes the edge
With a MegaOne score of 9/10 versus 8/10, Cursor edges ahead of GitHub Copilot in our analysis. However, GitHub Copilot may still be the better choice depending on your specific use case and budget.