Continue vs Supermaven
Which Code Assistant is right for you? See our complete breakdown.
| Feature | Continue | Supermaven |
|---|---|---|
| MegaOne Score | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Category | Code Assistant | Code Assistant |
| Pricing Model | Open Source | Freemium |
| Starting Price | Free / Open Source | $10.00/mo |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| API Available | No | No |
| Open Source | No | No |
| iOS App | No | No |
| Android App | No | No |
| Chrome Extension | No | No |
| Company | Continue Dev, Inc. (acquired by Cursor) | Supermaven, Inc. (acquired by Anysphere, Inc. dba Cursor) |
| Total Funding | $2M | $12M |
Visual Comparison
About Continue
An open-source AI coding assistant that integrated with IDEs and supported various LLMs, which was acquired by Cursor in June 2026 and is now winding down.
Continue.dev was an open-source AI coding tool available as a VS Code extension, JetBrains plugin, and CLI, enabling developers to integrate various large language models (LLMs) for autocomplete, chat, and agentic workflows. It prioritized flexibility, privacy, and model agnosticism, allowing users to connect to cloud-hosted providers or run local models. As of June 2026, Continue.dev has been acquired by Cursor, and the standalone product is being shut down, with its GitHub repository now read-only and cloud services ceasing by July…
About Supermaven
Supermaven was an AI code completion tool known for its ultra-fast, context-aware suggestions, whose standalone product was discontinued in late 2025 after being acquired by Cursor.
Supermaven was an AI coding assistant that provided fast, high-quality code suggestions with a 1 million token context window, integrating with popular IDEs like VS Code, JetBrains, and Neovim. It also featured a chat interface for interacting with various AI models. The standalone product was discontinued in late 2025 after its acquisition by Cursor, with its technology now integrated into Cursor's offerings.
It's a Tie
Both Continue and Supermaven scored 6/10 in our analysis. Your choice depends on specific needs — check the feature comparison above to see which fits your workflow better.