Head-to-Head Comparison
Cody vs Cursor
Which Code Assistant is right for you? See our complete breakdown.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Cody | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| MegaOne Score | 7/10 | 9/10 |
| Category | Code Assistant | Code Assistant |
| Pricing Model | Enterprise | Freemium |
| Starting Price | $59.00/mo | $20.00/mo |
| Free Tier | No | Yes |
| API Available | No | No |
| Open Source | No | No |
| iOS App | No | No |
| Android App | No | No |
| Chrome Extension | No | No |
| Company | Sourcegraph Inc. | Anysphere, Inc. |
| Total Funding | $248M | $3.3B |
Visual Comparison
Cody Cursor
About Cody
Cody is an AI coding assistant that leverages Sourcegraph's code intelligence platform to understand, write, and fix code faster for enterprise teams.
Cody is an AI coding assistant built on Sourcegraph's code search and code-graph technology, designed exclusively for enterprise engineering teams. It provides chat, autocomplete, code edits, and customizable prompts, grounded in the entire codebase across multiple repositories for accurate and context-aware suggestions. Cody integrates with popular IDEs like VS Code, JetBrains, and Visual Studio, and supports various large language models.
About Cursor
Cursor is your coding agent for building ambitious software.
Cursor is an AI coding platform and development environment that helps developers write, edit, search, and understand code using natural-language instructions. It features agentic development workflows, allowing developers to delegate coding tasks to AI agents for multi-file edits, code generation, and code review with tools like Bugbot. It supports both local and cloud agents and offers context-aware code completion.
The Verdict
Cursor takes the edge
With a MegaOne score of 9/10 versus 7/10, Cursor edges ahead of Cody in our analysis. However, Cody may still be the better choice depending on your specific use case and budget.
Related Coverage
